Java getters and setters

getters and setters come out of one of the fundamental Object Oriented Programming (OOP) concepts called encapsulation. Encapsulation is a way of wrapping data (variables) and the coding doing something with that data (methods) together. We encapsulate class variables and hide them from other classes and make them accessible only through methods of the current class.

Encapsulation with Getters and Setters

To achieve encapsulation in Java

  • Declare the variables of a class as private.
  • Provide public setter and getter methods to modify and view the variables values.

That sounds all great and, if you are anything like me, doesn’t really mean much without an example. So, let’s do that.
public class Employee{

   private String name;
   private String idNum;
   private int age;

   public int getAge(){
      return age;

   public String getName(){
      return name;

   public String getIdNum(){
      return idNum;

   public void setAge( int newAge){
      age = newAge;

   public void setName(String newName){
      name = newName;

   public void setIdNum( String newId){
      idNum = newId;

Obviously, we would store much more about an employee, but this is just a sample. Now, to the question of how do you access this “hidden” data from another class.
public class RunEmployee{

   public static void main(String args[]){
      Employee employee = new Employee();

      System.out.print("Name: " + employee.getName() +  
                                   " | Age: " + employee.getAge() +  
                                   " | Id: " + employee.getIdNum());

If we were to run this we would get the following output:

Name: James | Age: 20 | Id: 12343ms

Encapsulation Benefits

Some of the benefits of encapsulation include:

  • The fields of a class can be made read-only or write-only.
  • A class can have total control over what is stored in its fields.
  • The users of a class do not know how the class stores its data. A class can change the data type of a field and users of the class do not need to change any of their code.

Happy coding!


Numeric Inputs and Browser Differences

I was working on a project the other day building a user information input form off of a mock design. Simple enough and then I got to an input requiring numbers for US Postal Codes. “Great!” I thought, “I can use an <input type=’number’> in my form.” Everything was spiffy until I tried it in various browsers. Let’s have a quick look at numeric inputs and browser differences.

Numeric Inputs

In Chrome, the form was rendered as:

No spinner in Chrome!

Looks pretty good, right? Nice and clean. Then I opened it in Firefox:

Spinner for Firefox!

What the heck? I didn’t add a number spinner in there. After digging around for a bit this is one of the wonderful side affects of a lack of specificity in the official specification. Further, if one continues to read through that particular specification ( Number state (type=number)) one learns a couple of things.

  1. This specification does not define what user interface user agents are to use, and
  2. That it would be inappropriate for credit card numbers or US postal codes.

Okay, so I choose the wrong type for my input field. But what is the deal with that spinner? What if I just want an actual number field but no spinner? Well, you smack it out of there with some CSS and the appearance property. If one uses:

/* Firefox - remove spinner */
input[type=number] {
  -moz-appearance: textfield;

The lovely spinner disappears. I won’t cover the rest of the browsers as they all are similar but slightly different.

When then, do we use <input type=”number”>? Again, in looking at the specification, one would use it when one needs a number that is strictly speaking a number. It is also useful, with the spinner or not, if we want to limit the range and stepping of the number as follows:

<input type=number min=0 step=0.01 name=price>


Another wonderful discovery of different renderings in different browsers. But, not that we know, we can allow our users to have the same experience in both browsers.

Happy coding!